The scheme seeks to build a balanced portfolio, which would provide a combination of high annual return and capital appreciation. The scheme was made open-ended from March 2000.
The scheme seeks to generate long term growth of capital and current income through a portfolio investing predominantly in equity and equity related instruments and the balance in debt and money market securities.
36.7% of the combined portfolio weight is common between Canara Robeco Equity Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth and Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth.
34 stocks appear in both portfolios.
The largest shared holding is ICICI Bank Ltd., at 4.65% of Canara Robeco Equity Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth and 4.15% of Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth.
The funds share a meaningful part of their portfolios but still differ enough to add some diversification.
Largest common holdings
ICICI Bank Ltd.HDFC Bank Ltd.Bharti Airtel Ltd.State Bank of IndiaReliance Industries Ltd.Larsen & Toubro Ltd.Axis Bank Ltd.NTPC Ltd.
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth has delivered the higher 3-year CAGR (15.04% vs 12.54%). Canara Robeco Equity Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth is the cheaper of the two with an expense ratio of 0.62% against 0.77%. Canara Robeco Equity Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth manages the larger corpus at ₹11.14k Cr. There is no single "better" fund — the right choice depends on your holding period, risk appetite and what you already own. Use the returns, risk and portfolio overlap tables above to judge which fits your portfolio, and remember that past returns do not guarantee future performance.
Over 1 year, Canara Robeco Equity Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth returned 5.87% against 5.84% for Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth; and over 3 years, Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth leads with a 15.04% CAGR versus 12.54%. Returns beyond one year are CAGR (annualised). Short-period returns are heavily influenced by market cycles, so compare over at least three to five years before drawing conclusions.
Canara Robeco Equity Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth has the lower expense ratio at 0.62%, compared with 0.77% for Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth — a difference of 0.15% a year. The expense ratio is deducted from NAV daily, so a lower ratio directly improves your net return, though it should not be the only reason to pick a fund.
Both Canara Robeco Equity Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth and Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth carry a "Very High" rating on the SEBI Riskometer. Within the same riskometer band, differences still show up in maximum drawdown, volatility and market-cap mix — all of which are compared in the tables above.
The portfolio overlap between the two funds is 36.7%, which is considered moderate. At this level the funds share a meaningful part of their portfolios but still differ enough to add some diversification. You can see the shared stocks in the overlap section above.
Yes — both are Hybrid: Aggressive Hybrid funds, which means they follow similar mandates and are benchmarked against comparable indices. That makes a direct comparison of returns, expense ratio and risk meaningful.
Canara Robeco Equity Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth has a NAV of ₹428.01 and an AUM of ₹11.14k Cr, and was launched on 31 Dec 2012. Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth has a NAV of ₹77.03 and an AUM of ₹3.78k Cr, launched on 6 Jan 2013. NAV on its own says nothing about how expensive or cheap a fund is — only the return on it matters.
