The scheme seeks to generate long term growth of capital and current income through a portfolio investing predominantly in equity and equity related instruments and the balance in debt and money market securities.
The Scheme seeks to generate capital appreciation along with current income from a combined portfolio of equity & equity related instruments and debt and money market instruments.
42.4% of the combined portfolio weight is common between Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth and Mirae Asset Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth.
40 stocks appear in both portfolios.
The largest shared holding is HDFC Bank Ltd., at 3.52% of Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth and 6.47% of Mirae Asset Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth.
The funds share a meaningful part of their portfolios but still differ enough to add some diversification.
Largest common holdings
HDFC Bank Ltd.ICICI Bank Ltd.State Bank of IndiaReliance Industries Ltd.Bharti Airtel Ltd.NTPC Ltd.Larsen & Toubro Ltd.National Bank For Agriculture & Rural Development
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth has delivered the higher 3-year CAGR (15.04% vs 12.46%). Mirae Asset Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth is the cheaper of the two with an expense ratio of 0.62% against 0.77%. Mirae Asset Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth manages the larger corpus at ₹9.43k Cr. There is no single "better" fund — the right choice depends on your holding period, risk appetite and what you already own. Use the returns, risk and portfolio overlap tables above to judge which fits your portfolio, and remember that past returns do not guarantee future performance.
Over 1 year, Mirae Asset Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth returned 6.54% against 5.84% for Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth; and over 3 years, Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth leads with a 15.04% CAGR versus 12.46%. Returns beyond one year are CAGR (annualised). Short-period returns are heavily influenced by market cycles, so compare over at least three to five years before drawing conclusions.
Mirae Asset Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth has the lower expense ratio at 0.62%, compared with 0.77% for Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth — a difference of 0.15% a year. The expense ratio is deducted from NAV daily, so a lower ratio directly improves your net return, though it should not be the only reason to pick a fund.
Both Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth and Mirae Asset Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth carry a "Very High" rating on the SEBI Riskometer. Within the same riskometer band, differences still show up in maximum drawdown, volatility and market-cap mix — all of which are compared in the tables above.
The portfolio overlap between the two funds is 42.4%, which is considered moderate. At this level the funds share a meaningful part of their portfolios but still differ enough to add some diversification. You can see the shared stocks in the overlap section above.
Yes — both are Hybrid: Aggressive Hybrid funds, which means they follow similar mandates and are benchmarked against comparable indices. That makes a direct comparison of returns, expense ratio and risk meaningful.
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth has a NAV of ₹77.03 and an AUM of ₹3.78k Cr, and was launched on 6 Jan 2013. Mirae Asset Aggressive Hybrid Fund Direct-Growth has a NAV of ₹39.85 and an AUM of ₹9.43k Cr, launched on 29 Jul 2015. NAV on its own says nothing about how expensive or cheap a fund is — only the return on it matters.
