LIC Mutual Fund

LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth

Equity: Large Cap - Growth (Open ended)
LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-GrowthNAV: 277.38 as on 16 Jul, 2026
Risk levelCategoryBenchmark
Copyright © 2026 sharpely. All rights reserved.
Factsheet
SEBI Riskometer: Very HighCategory: Equity: Large CapBenchmark: NIFTY 100 Total Return Index
₹276.49+0.89%
17 Jul 2026

Tracking Difference

Annualised return gap between LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth and its benchmark index over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and 10Y periods, compared to the average of all funds tracking the same benchmark.
Name1 Y3 Y5 Y10 Y
Fund-0.25%-0.35%-0.31%-0.34%
Avg. of funds with same benchmark-0.25%-0.35%-0.31%-0.34%

Rolling Returns Analysis

Rolling annualized returns of LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth across 1Y, 3Y and 5Y windows — average, best, worst returns and percentage of positive return periods.
Metric1 Yr Rolling Returns3 Yr Rolling Returns5 Yr Rolling Returns7 Yr Rolling Returns
Analysis period27 Mar, 2017 - 17 Jul, 202601 Apr, 2019 - 17 Jul, 202613 Apr, 2021 - 17 Jul, 202624 Apr, 2023 - 17 Jul, 2026
Average returns14.83%14.05%15.08%13.90%
Standard deviation16.75%5.06%3.14%1.14%
Best returns88.34%
1 year ending on 25 Mar, 2021
31.72%
3 years ending on 03 Apr, 2023
26.48%
5 years ending on 16 Apr, 2025
16.45%
7 years ending on 29 Jan, 2024
Worst returns-32.41%
1 year ending on 23 Mar, 2020
-4.72%
3 years ending on 23 Mar, 2020
9.17%
5 years ending on 30 Mar, 2026
11.02%
7 years ending on 28 Feb, 2025
Period with positive return86.34%98.72%100.00%100.00%
Period with return > 5%71.24%93.00%100.00%100.00%
Period with return > 10%55.44%85.33%99.31%100.00%
Period with return > 15%38.64%43.36%51.58%21.53%
Beat % Category58.31%57.70%73.90%75.47%
Beat % Benchmark31.64%31.13%26.87%19.65%

Trailing Returns

Point-to-point returns of LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth vs category average for YTD, 1M, 6M, 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and 10Y periods — with category rank and total funds count.
-5%
0%
5%
10%
-4.6%
-3.5%
-5.3%
YTD
1.0%
0.9%
0.6%
1 M
-3.2%
-2.2%
-3.9%
6 M
-0.9%
-0.2%
-1.9%
1 Y
9.8%
10.8%
9.8%
3 Y
10.3%
10.6%
10.4%
5 Y
12.3%
11.9%
12.5%
10 Y
Fund
Equity: Large Cap
NIFTY 100 Total Return Index
NameYTD1 M6 M1 Y3 Y5 Y10 YSince Inception
Fund-4.59%0.99%-3.16%-0.90%9.80%10.29%12.25%13.34%
Equity: Large Cap-3.53%0.92%-2.16%-0.25%10.83%10.61%11.88%-
NIFTY 100 Total Return Index-5.30%0.59%-3.90%-1.86%9.84%10.42%12.50%-
Rank in category73987465533918-
Funds in category1641711661551219965-

Period Returns

Calendar-year, quarterly and monthly return history of LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth. Toggle between bar chart and table view to analyse periodic performance trends.

Historical Performance

Track NAV movement and cumulative returns of LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth across 1M, 6M, 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and since-inception periods. Compare SIP and lumpsum growth over time.

Compare performance with respect to
Add benchmark

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the 1-year returns of LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth?
LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth has delivered a 1-year return of -0.90% as of 16 Jul 2026. During the same period, its benchmark NIFTY 100 Total Return Index returned -1.86%. The fund has outperformed its benchmark over this period.
What are the 3-year returns of LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth?
LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth has delivered a 3-year CAGR of 9.80% as of 16 Jul 2026. Its benchmark NIFTY 100 Total Return Index returned 9.84% CAGR over the same period. CAGR (Compounded Annual Growth Rate) is the right way to evaluate multi-year ETF performance as it smooths out year-to-year volatility.
What are the 5-year returns of LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth?
LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth has delivered a 5-year CAGR of 10.29% as of 16 Jul 2026. Its benchmark NIFTY 100 Total Return Index returned 10.42% CAGR over the same period. A 5-year track record is considered a more reliable indicator of fund quality than shorter-term performance, as it captures at least one full market cycle.
What are the returns of LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth since inception?
Since its launch on 16 Mar 2016, LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth has delivered a CAGR of 13.34%. Since-inception returns reflect the fund's full history and give the most complete picture of long-term performance.
How has LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth performed vs its category over the long term?
Over the long term, LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth has ranked 53 out of 121 funds in the Equity: Large Cap category on a 3-year basis, and 39 out of 99 funds on a 5-year basis. Category rank is one of several factors to consider alongside risk metrics and rolling return consistency when evaluating a fund.
What is the Sharpe ratio of LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth?
The Sharpe ratio of LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth is 0.34 (as of 16 Jul 2026). The Sharpe ratio measures how much return the fund generates per unit of risk (volatility) taken. A Sharpe ratio above 1.0 is generally considered good — the higher the ratio, the better the risk-adjusted return.
What is the alpha of LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth?
The 3Y alpha of LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth is -0.29% (as of 16 Jul 2026). Alpha measures the excess return generated by the fund over and above its benchmark NIFTY 100 Total Return Index, after adjusting for risk. A positive alpha means the fund manager has added value beyond what the market delivered. A negative alpha means the fund has underperformed its benchmark on a risk-adjusted basis.
What is the beta of LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth?
The beta of LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth is 1.01 (as of 16 Jul 2026). Beta measures how sensitive the fund is to market movements relative to its benchmark NIFTY 100 Total Return Index. A beta of 1 means the fund moves in line with the market. A beta above 1 means it is more volatile than the market; below 1 means it is less volatile. LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth's beta of 1.01 indicates it is more aggressive than its benchmark.
What are the rolling returns of LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth?
The average 1-year and 3-year rolling returns of LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF-Growth is 14.83% and 14.05% respectively. Rolling returns show the fund's annualized return across every possible 1-year and 3-year investment window, making them a far more reliable measure of consistency than point-to-point returns, which depend heavily on the start and end date chosen.