
Nippon India ETF Gold BeES
Price & Volume
Key Talking Points
Low tracking error
Tracking error of the ETF (0.4%) is low
This is a measure of how well an Index fund/ETF has been able to replicate the performance of the benchmark its tracking. As a passive investor, lower tracking error is always better
What is Tracking Error?
ETF's average daily traded value is high
This ETF's average 21-day turnover is relatively high at Rs 319.0 cr.
This is measured as average daily traded value (over last 21 trading days) on NSE and BSE combined (as applicable). Lower volume could imply low liquidity which could increase the transaction cost when buying/selling the ETF
What is Turnover (1M)?
Relatively high expense ratio
Expense ratio of the ETF (0.81%) is higher than average expense ratio of other Index funds/ETFs (0.69%) tracking Domestic Price of Gold Index
This measures the relative expense of the index fund/ETF with respect to average expense ratio all index funds/ETFs tracking the same benchmark. Investors should always prefer schemes with lower expense, everything else remaining the same
What is Expense ratio?
Very high tracking difference
Tracking difference of the ETF (1.91%) is high
This measures the difference in returns (last 1 year) between the Index fund/ETF and its respective benchmark. Lower absolute tracking difference is better
What is Tracking Difference (1Y)?
3-year performance has been average
3-year CAGR of 32.11% is between 25th and 75th percentile in its category - Commodities: Gold
This is measured by percentile rank of the scheme in its category based on 3-year CAGR. Lower rank implies that scheme was a relative outperformer in its category
What is CAGR (3Y)?
Scheme Overview
The fund aims to provide returns that closely correspond to the return provided by the price of gold through investment in physical gold. The reason for performance variance of the scheme from that of domestic price of gold may be due to expense and other related factors.