Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth
Equity: Value Oriented - Growth (Open ended) Factsheet
NAV: ₹126.88+0.55%
17 Jul 2026
Rolling Returns Analysis
Rolling annualized returns of Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth across 1Y, 3Y and 5Y windows — average, best, worst returns and percentage of positive return periods.
| Metric | 1 Yr Rolling Returns | 3 Yr Rolling Returns | 5 Yr Rolling Returns | 7 Yr Rolling Returns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis period | 21 Mar, 2007 - 17 Jul, 2026 | 06 Apr, 2009 - 17 Jul, 2026 | 15 Apr, 2011 - 17 Jul, 2026 | 25 Apr, 2013 - 17 Jul, 2026 |
| Average returns | 16.57% | 14.72% | 14.02% | 13.51% |
| Standard deviation | 25.55% | 7.20% | 5.09% | 2.78% |
| Best returns | 131.65% 1 year ending on 25 Mar, 2010 | 39.50% 3 years ending on 21 Mar, 2012 | 29.98% 5 years ending on 02 Apr, 2014 | 25.59% 7 years ending on 26 Apr, 2016 |
| Worst returns | -48.83% 1 year ending on 22 Jan, 2009 | -10.47% 3 years ending on 23 Mar, 2020 | -2.26% 5 years ending on 23 Mar, 2020 | 4.12% 7 years ending on 23 Mar, 2020 |
| Period with positive return | 79.77% | 96.34% | 99.63% | 100.00% |
| Period with return > 5% | 66.34% | 90.51% | 96.54% | 99.85% |
| Period with return > 10% | 54.65% | 80.39% | 78.65% | 94.84% |
| Period with return > 15% | 44.05% | 50.86% | 42.67% | 17.90% |
| Beat % Category | 21.91% | 4.72% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
| Beat % Benchmark | 58.94% | 60.30% | 54.51% | 45.44% |
Trailing Returns
Point-to-point returns of Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth vs category average for YTD, 1M, 6M, 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and 10Y periods — with category rank and total funds count.
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
-5.3%
-0.2%
-1.7%
YTD
1.7%
0.5%
1.2%
1 M
-4.9%
0.5%
-0.1%
6 M
-3.7%
3.6%
0.6%
1 Y
12.1%
16.4%
12.5%
3 Y
11.3%
14.7%
12.3%
5 Y
11.3%
14.9%
13.8%
10 Y
Fund
Equity: Value Oriented
BSE 500 Total Return Index
| Name | YTD | 1 M | 6 M | 1 Y | 3 Y | 5 Y | 10 Y | Since Inception |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fund | -5.30% | 1.67% | -4.94% | -3.75% | 12.13% | 11.29% | 11.28% | 13.29% |
| Equity: Value Oriented | -0.17% | 0.51% | 0.46% | 3.59% | 16.39% | 14.70% | 14.88% | - |
| BSE 500 Total Return Index | -1.69% | 1.21% | -0.11% | 0.62% | 12.50% | 12.29% | 13.77% | - |
| Rank in category | 26 | 10 | 28 | 26 | 22 | 16 | 13 | - |
| Funds in category | 30 | 32 | 30 | 29 | 24 | 17 | 13 | - |
Period Returns
Calendar-year, quarterly and monthly return history of Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth. Toggle between bar chart and table view to analyse periodic performance trends.
Historical Performance
Track NAV movement and cumulative returns of Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth across 1M, 6M, 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and since-inception periods. Compare SIP and lumpsum growth over time.
Compare performance with respect toAdd benchmark
Add benchmark
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the 1-year returns of Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth?
Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth has delivered a 1-year return of -3.75% as of 16 Jul 2026. During the same period, its benchmark BSE 500 Total Return Index returned 0.62%. The fund has underperformed its benchmark over this period.
What are the 3-year returns of Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth?
Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth has delivered a 3-year CAGR of 12.13% as of 16 Jul 2026. Its benchmark BSE 500 Total Return Index returned 12.50% CAGR over the same period. CAGR (Compounded Annual Growth Rate) is the right way to evaluate multi-year mutual fund performance as it smooths out year-to-year volatility.
What are the 5-year returns of Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth?
Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth has delivered a 5-year CAGR of 11.29% as of 16 Jul 2026. Its benchmark BSE 500 Total Return Index returned 12.29% CAGR over the same period. A 5-year track record is considered a more reliable indicator of fund quality than shorter-term performance, as it captures at least one full market cycle.
What are the returns of Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth since inception?
Since its launch on 13 Mar 2006, Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth has delivered a CAGR of 13.29%. Since-inception returns reflect the fund's full history and give the most complete picture of long-term performance.
How has Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth performed vs its category over the long term?
Over the long term, Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth has ranked 22 out of 24 funds in the Equity: Value Oriented category on a 3-year basis, and 16 out of 17 funds on a 5-year basis. Category rank is one of several factors to consider alongside risk metrics and rolling return consistency when evaluating a fund.
What is the Sharpe ratio of Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth?
The Sharpe ratio of Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth is 0.48 (as of 16 Jul 2026). The Sharpe ratio measures how much return the fund generates per unit of risk (volatility) taken. A Sharpe ratio above 1.0 is generally considered good — the higher the ratio, the better the risk-adjusted return.
What is the alpha of Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth?
The 3Y alpha of Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth is 0.42% (as of 16 Jul 2026). Alpha measures the excess return generated by the fund over and above its benchmark BSE 500 Total Return Index, after adjusting for risk. A positive alpha means the fund manager has added value beyond what the market delivered. A negative alpha means the fund has underperformed its benchmark on a risk-adjusted basis.
What is the beta of Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth?
The beta of Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth is 0.85 (as of 16 Jul 2026). Beta measures how sensitive the fund is to market movements relative to its benchmark BSE 500 Total Return Index. A beta of 1 means the fund moves in line with the market. A beta above 1 means it is more volatile than the market; below 1 means it is less volatile. Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth's beta of 0.85 indicates it is more defensive than its benchmark.
What are the rolling returns of Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth?
The average 1-year and 3-year rolling returns of Quantum Value Fund Direct-Growth is 16.57% and 14.72% respectively. Rolling returns show the fund's annualized return across every possible 1-year and 3-year investment window, making them a far more reliable measure of consistency than point-to-point returns, which depend heavily on the start and end date chosen.